Lawmakers don’t know enough technically to make a law that wouldn’t have unforeseen and damaging consequences, even if they supported net neutrality.That sentiment covers about the last 100 years of legislation.
Blatantly stolen from NixGuy
|
 Offended? Intrigued? Contact my manager. |
Here begins your journey into the mind of everybody's favorite asian, and I don't mean Jet Li. What follows is the somewhat inane, mostly irrelevant, and self-important ramblings of a man on the brink of madness. Welcome... to the Chu. |
||
Monday, June 26, 2006
Probably my last post on Net Neutrality
[L]
From a Slashdot discussion on Net Neutrality:
Blatantly stolen from NixGuy
Blatantly stolen from NixGuy
Ain't that the truth...
By
Joel, at
6/26/2006 04:30:00 PM
You could say the same thing about interstate commerce, economics, military operations, and any other piece of government that Congress oversees or regulates. Members of Congress are not experts on anything. They are generalists who enlist the help of experts in their panels, committee hearings, etc. What technical reasons do you have for opposing net neutrality?
By
Kevin, at
6/30/2006 10:55:00 AM
^^^ speak up ^^^